| Author: | Matt Deatherage | |||
| Posted: | 1/11/07; 4:22:50 PM | |||
| Topic: | What oversight looks like | |||
| Msg #: | 1748 (top msg in thread) | |||
| Prev/Next: | 1747/1749 | |||
| Reads: | 11336 |
What oversight looks like
At the link, Glenn Greenwald discusses the administration's very deliberate increase in bellicosity towards Iran, including the news that the US has invaded the Iranian embassy in Iraq, something most Americans considered an act of war when the Iranians invaded the American embassy 27 years ago. This is all transpiring amidst a domestic debate about whether Congress (or, really, anyone) can prevent the president from escalating his war in Iraq.
What should a constitutionally-empowered Congress do when faced with such a president? How about a clear and unambiguous statement from the congressional leadership:
If President Bush takes military action against Iran without congressional approval, the House Judiciary Committee will begin hearings on articles of impeachment within twelve hours of any such action.
If the president won't consult Congress before he starts a new war, he can explain it afterwards or go back to his ranch and let someone who believes in the Constitution clean up his messes. I'm sure his replacement, whether that's the vice president or whoever comes after him in the order of succession if he similarly refuses to obey the Constitution, can successfully wage and conclude whatever war with Iran the president illegally starts. If the president believes the country will back him as the only person who can get us out of what he got us into, he is as mistaken as he has been about everything else.
If I'm Nancy Pelosi, and there are so many ways in which I'm not, I'd step down as speaker of the house before any impeachment trial against a theoretical President Cheney. Not to pile onto the giant group hug of the late President Ford, but he was a creature of the House and belonged there; he accepted his president's call to serve as vice president, and ran again both for his party and for the same reason Truman ran in 1948 - to keep someone he perceived as more radical, like Bob Dole or "Scoop" Jackson from taking the office and making things worse.
Pelosi is untried and untested as speaker, but if that's the job she wants, she should not surrender it to take the White House, no matter how much pressure she'd feel to be the first woman president of the United States. Most Democratic house speakers don't have presidential ambitions, and I see nothing wrong with that. Let Pelosi step down with the intent of returning to the rostrum after a new speaker is selected to become the 44th president, should both George W. Bush and Dick Cheney have to be removed from office. Let House members show their ambitions, make their cases, and build public support for their candidacy for the White House, so the process is more open. If Bush and Cheney must be removed from office, and starting war with Iran would certainly be cause for such removal, the replacement process should be as open as the statutes for the order of succession allow, and Pelosi should not feel obliged to become president if she thinks she can serve the country better in the House.
[ Print This Page ]