| Author: | Matt Deatherage | |||
| Posted: | 1/9/03; 11:40:37 AM | |||
| Topic: | Police kill dog | |||
| Msg #: | 454 (top msg in thread) | |||
| Prev/Next: | 453/455 | |||
| Reads: | 17716 |
Police kill dog
The police, for their part, have been pretending all along that the incident "couldn't have been avoided" and "regret" that the dog died. Let's explore what could have been done differently:
- The officer could have listened to the family and closed the door of the car to keep the dogs in.
- If the officer thought the dogs were a danger to him, he definitely should have closed the car door to keep them contained.
- If the officer wanted to search the car, he should have called animal control for the dogs and then searched the car.
- If he didn't want to search the car, he didn't need to worry about keeping the dogs in it.
- If he didn't think the dogs were a threat (so he didn't close the door), he definitely didn't need to shoot one of them.
In short, he should have closed the car door. There's no excuse for anything else that happened because he let the dog out without reason.
Police officers have a tough job, but let me point out that if any other individual in the country ignored a warning to close a car door and shot and killed a scampering dog, he would be facing at least a year in jail. You can argue, if you want, that police should be immune for committing some crimes in the line of duty, but at the very least, this officer has disqualified himself from law enforcement. If he's not dismissed, what does that tell you about the government's committment to a police force that is above reproach?
[ Print This Page ]